Key Issues in the Current Debate on Sustainability Reporting?
Following on from our earlier post about the Benefits of Sustainability Reporting, Ulrike Schuermann from Momentum International Partnerships outlines the key issues surrounding sustainability reporting for Soul Economy. It would be great to hear your thoughts, ideas and experiences.
One, if not THE key issue is how we can achieve a balance between appropriate regulation and voluntary reporting so the government can fulfil its role in enforcing a level playing field. This could be achieved by introducing incentives such as relieving reporting companies from obligations to report separately to individual government departments, however, is not being dealt with here in depth.
At this moment, only very few countries request publicly listed companies to issue sustainability reports by law, one of these countries is France. Australia has conducted a parliamentary inquiry into this issues which resulted in a series of recommendations including that sustainability reporting should remain voluntary in Australia.
We therefore are faced with a proliferation and fragmentation of national level guidelines, which poses particular problems for multi-national companies in collecting consistent data. Adopting a publicly recognised, global set of performance indicators, and, despite its critics, it seems very much like the Global Reporting Initiative is emerging as the dominant global reference framework, is therefore highly desirable and can only be achieved through international cooperation and collective action.
Another issue is the need for independent verification and assurance of reports to provide comfort to stakeholders, management and the board in mitigating the risks posed by sustainability issues. Only a fraction of reports are independently assured, however, just like reporting itself, the trend is positive and gives rise to optimism.
Lastly, I would like to stress the need for business to identify material issues and link financial with non-financial aspects of corporate reporting which is an area most reporters are still grappling with. Those of us who actually read sustainability reports have been entertained with feel good stories and anecdotes about good corporate citizenship, with some enlightened exceptions.
Sustainability reporting is only one small part of the sustainability agenda be it an important one and certainly not a goal in itself. The purpose of sustainability reporting is to summarise and report issues that matter. This is a very quick moving field with evolving best practice and I would like to leave you with a few questions:
- Is the stand alone sustainability reporting sustainable or will the annual report and sustainability report merge into one meaningful document giving us a complete picture of a business performance in social, environmental, economic and governance terms?
- Are current business models equipped to deal with the new requirements?
- What is the risk to business of the impact of climate change and other material issues?
My next article on sustainability reporting will deal with the available standards, codes and guidelines including the Global reporting initiative and review a few sustainability reports.
Popularity: 62% [?]





October 3rd, 2008 at 10:37 pm
hi, whilst the combination of financial and non-financials into one report sounds like a nice easy compact way to present all stakeholders with one comprehensive information pack, I tend to think this is not the way to go. Annual financial reports and sustainability reports are produced for different audiences, thought there is of course overlap. The nature of the reports are entirely different – financials being constrained by legaleze and accountanteze and long lists of numbers who all but the most competent of financial analysts have no idea what or why they are there. Sustainability reporting is about the other purpose – the things the company does other than make and money (to use Cristine Arena’s core question). Its the story of how the Company interacts and impacts on stakeholders, backed up with sets of pertinent and explanatory data. The sustainability report has scope to be creative, passionate and unique to the spirit of each company. The worst thing that could happen to sustainability reporting would be to depress its spirit by contraining it to financial reporting regulations and frameworks. I fully agree that materialilty should link to financial performance and this can be reflected in the sustainability report.
Actually I just yesterday sent some feedback to Deloitte (didnt get a response yet). They have , amidst big fanfare, issued their first sustainabiltiy report. It is not GRI referenced or indexed, follows no known reporting framework, extremely light on data , omits material issues and reads like a marketing brochure. I was astounded that a business of this stature who does actually behave in a highly responsible way, by all accounts, should produce a report of such little depth, when the level of professional reporting worldwide has advanced so greatly over the past few years.
Anyway, i think im a rambling, as you can see, i have a passion for reporting (it’s my profession) and am always happy to engage in the debate. I am also a certified Assurance provider, and clearly support the need for external assurance, not only to check the data, but to ensure the reporting company is clear on the reporting expectations around materiality and bad news issues as well as good news.
Thanks for raising these issues.
elaine
social business consultant
potential one, israel, http://www.potential-one.com
October 5th, 2008 at 7:01 pm
Hi Elaine
Thank you for your comments and insights. I too agree that companies need to report not only on the good news but also on the issues, and indicate plans for improving on these.